Showing posts with label airport expansion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label airport expansion. Show all posts

13 October 2016

New runways should be chosen for both Heathrow and Gatwick.



Heathrow cargo soars in the wake of Britain’s Brexit vote (11-10-16) 
"Heathrow welcomed a record number of passengers in September, with 6.8 million travelling through the UK’s only hub airport"which means 75.36 million  pax over the previous 12 months.

 

Gatwick’s record growth and booming long haul services continue to defy Airports Commission predictions (10-10-16)
"In September, 4.3 million passengers travelled through the airport which is +6.9% on the same month in 2015. Gatwick now serves 42.3 million passengers a year – this is a milestone the Airports Commission forecast Gatwick would not reach until 2030."

and just to show that the other airports are not affected negatively............

Stansted tantalisingly close to pre-recession passenger numbers (12-10-16) 
"The total number of passengers using Stansted in the 12 months ending September reached 24,009,348, up 8.4 per cent on the previous year and just 6,000 short of the record high set in October 2007........During September, nearly 2.2 million passengers passed through Stansted, up seven per cent on the same month last year and the second busiest September ever for the airport."

A record 14 million passengers use London Luton over the last year(13-10-16)       ".....the rolling annual total of passengers using the airport passed the 14 million mark for the first time....The airport saw its 30th consecutive month of passenger growth in September...... a record 1.4 million passengers chose to fly from the UK gateway last month."

There is a lot of pent-up demand which cannot be completely satisfied under the present slot restricted regimes at the two principal airports.

This blogger has never hidden the fact that he firmly believes in a new runway at each of the two airports............

..............................................but under what conditions?
The government is said to be making its decision in the next few days. This is a resume of the salient points to be included. 
 

----------------------------------------------------- 

 

Heathrow:

The plans have already been presented to the public, with the favourite alternative at LHR being the third runway to the north of the present runways and between the A437 Bath Road and the M4 Motorway.

Heathrow 3rd runway option over M25

Heathrow airport has its own website ("Heathrow the Right Choice") to explain its plans for expansion and a third runway.


 Musts: for the third runway
  • be between 3km and 3.5km. long x 45m. wide (to enable it to be used for up to large aircraft in exceptional circumstances when one of the others is closed. To be operated in mixed-mode for all the flights from its terminal so that there is no crossing of runways to the present terminals 2,3,4 and 5)
  • extend no further west than the M25 (with any planned widenings factored in) and far enough to the east so that the terminal can sit next to or above the new railway station below ground (thus excessive walking distances to public transport can be avoided)
  • have a dedicated terminal for all its flights (this used to be called T6 but could take the name T1 to replace the demolished terminal of that name) 
  • have a new railway station to be built underground to provide connections to the other terminals and central London (thus Crossrail and Heathrow Express can stop for passengers - to connect to the London Underground both HE as well as Crossrail trains would stop at Ealing Broadway)
  • be limited to medium and small jet aircraft plus turbo props (this could mean up to the size B737, A320 and similar plus exceptionally what is needed for flights to Israel if bigger).
  • be aircraft with low polluting thresholds (establishing strict limitation goals for the opening of the runway).
  • operate airside all vehicles of whatever type which are non-polluting. (no combustion-engined vehicles at all from the opening date)
  • be for British Isles and other island flights plus Benlux destinations (so that every British and Irish destination is served if so desired - this can be extended to the flights of other countries like Israel and Switzerland. This can be further refined to include other European island countries such as Iceland, Malta, Cyprus and the Faroes)
  • operate strict hours to be established for normal operations but flexible enough to vary slightly in exceptional circumstances (this would include the ability of operators to reposition aircraft when affected by e.g.adverse weather conditions)
  • establish a clear short-term timetable for these anti-pollution measures and the operating hours to be applied in the rest of the airport airside, and then to be extended to the whole airport within a generation.(this would include cars, taxis, buses, coaches and commercial vehicles unless they used non-polluting propulsion and thus promote the use of public transport)
  • the financing of any expansion in the airport is the sole responsibility of the airport itself (the government will only finance complementary infrastructure outside the airport boundary where necessary - this will encourage the airport to make the investment without expensive embellishments)
  • Reinstate a modified Cranford Agreement about the alternating use of the north(actual but future central runway) and south runways which was abolished in 2010
  • Start planning and programming the connection by new railway line from Reading to Heathrow to Gatwick, and the extension from Gatwick to Ashford so as to be able able to provide direct rail services to mainland Europe, to be completed by 2030 (insofar as these works affect the airport).
  • demand that Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd. redraws its plans for a third runway so as to make it less unnecessarily complex and intrusive thus reducing the cost.(e.g. are so many taxiways needed in their latest plans?)
  • combine the Heathrow Express services with the Stansted Express services so that passengers from both can enter into central London without having to disembark at their terminal stations, and access can be direct between the two airports.

 ---------------------------------------------------

 

Gatwick:
has been London´s second airport for many decades but is growing at such a rate that a second runway is considered necessary for future development.
The placement of the additional runway will affect fewer townships/villages than at Heathrow. The construction can be started after the end of the limiting agreement with West Sussex Council which runs out in mid 2019.
The runway can be built and operative before the new terminal is opened.  
Gatwick airport with second runway and third terminal.

Gatwick aiport has an extensive website (here) to explain its design on expansion including a second runway.

 

 Musts: for the second runway
  • be between 3km and 3.5km. long x 45m. wide (to enable it to be used for up to large aircraft just as the present runway is used)
  • start construction as soon as possible so that it can be brought into service asap even before the opening of the new terminal and its satellites.
  • have a dedicated terminal and satellites for all the flights which avoid, where possible, conflicting ground movements of aircraft manouvering between terminals.
  • a new light rail system to be built underground or overground to connect all the terminals and to the central National Rail station(thus Gatwick Express and other regional rail companies can serve all passengers without multiple changes of vehicles)
  • the same light rail inter-terminal system would connect a central bus/coach station and car parks for private vehicles. 
  • be limited to aircraft with low polluting thresholds (establishing strict limitation goals for the opening of the runway).
  • operate airside all vehicles of whatever type which are non-polluting. (no combustion-engined vehicles at all from the opening date)
  • be open for any operator/ to any destination but only passenger and freight traffic. (no private flights)
  • operate strict hours to be established for normal operations but flexible enough to vary slightly in exceptional circumstances (this would include the ability of operators to reposition aircraft when affected by e.g.adverse weather conditions)
  • establish a clear short-term timetable for these anti-pollution measures and the operating hours to be applied in the rest of the airport airside, and then to be extended to the whole airport within a generation.(this would include cars, taxis, buses, coaches and commercial vehicles unless they used non-polluting propulsion and thus promote the use of public transport)
  • the financing of any expansion in the airport is the sole responsibility of the airport itself(the government will only finance complementary infrastructure outside the airport boundary where necessary - this will encourage the airport to make the investment without expensive embellishments)
  • Apply an agreement about the alternating use of the north and south runways for take-offs and landings so as to provide relief to local residents if considered necessary/advisable.
  • Start planning and programming the connection by new railway line to Heathrow, and the extension from Gatwick to Ashford so as to be able to provide direct rail services to mainland Europe, to be completed by 2030 (insofar as these works affect the airport) 


To build an additional runway at each of the two principal London airports these points/conditions must be included. If that is done then the needs of the business lobby can be squared with the worries/doubts of the environmental lobby to enable construction to commence.

Building at both airports ensures competition is maintained between the two.

 

 

This blogger has written extensively on the subject of additional runways in South East England. Be it sufficient to say that just two articles are there to understand the problems in detail 
 Heathrow´s 3rd runway - how to focus                      23-02-2012
 Heathrow and/or Gatwick - Let´s focus more             01-02-2015





01 February 2015

Heathrow and/or Gatwick - Let´s focus more

After having written a piece called "Heathrow´s 3rd runway - how to focus" in February 2012, it is about time to bring things up to date.

.....  Of course, you can look at these things from a very narrow perspective, or if you prefer you can see a bigger picture which is more illuminating.

The prestigious CAPA Centre for Aviation brings out analysises on a regular basis about different aspects of the airline industry.
In the last year alone, on 19th May 2014 it produced a study on the progress of the arguments in favour of one or another option for new runways titled, "London’s Heathrow and Gatwick airports commence the next phase of Davies Commission runway battle."
On 10th September 2014 this was followed up by another article titled,"Thames Estuary Airport dropped: a milestone reached in the eternal debate on UK airport capacity."

Some specialised periodicals have been publishing articles about the runway expansion debate. Here is a selection from September 2014 to January 2015. Each headline itself  tells a distinct story though each has its own link so that it can be read in its entirety. 


Buying Business Travel:
29th August 2014,         "Heathrow urges Boris to support bid for expansion"
1st September 2014,     "Boris attacks ‘barbaric’ Heathrow third runway plan"
2nd September 2014     " 'Boris Island' airport plan rejected"
9th September 2014,     "Majority of MPs back Heathrow expansion"
19th September 2014,   "Gatwick airport gains public support for expansion"
2nd October 2014,        "Birmingham airport backs Gatwick bid for second runway"
8th October 2014,         "Business leaders criticise Lib Dems for airport expansion stance" 
3rd November 2014,      "Willie Walsh: ‘No business case’ for second runway at Gatwick"
7th November 2014,      "Heathrow warns of losing top airport status" 
11th November 2014,    "Heathrow and Gatwick plans to cost billions more than forecast"
11th November 2014,    "Public back airport expansion in south east, ABTA study finds"
20th November 2014,    "Gatwick warns of 'capacity crunch' after record results" 
1st December 2014,     "Heathrow to extend property compensation scheme"
1st December 2014,     "Regional airport chiefs back Heathrow expansion"
3rd December 2014,     "Heathrow CEO ‘sorry’ over runway promise"
20th January 2015,       "County council opposes second runway at Gatwick"

travelweekly
1st September 2014,     "Address UK air capacity 'ticking time bomb', says CBI"
2nd September 2014,    " Public urged to speak out on airport expansion" 
22nd September 2014"Small businesses 'back expansion of Gatwick' "
30th September 2014,   "Osborne hints at speedy decision on airport capacity"
3rd October 2014,         "Gatwick pushes case for second runway at regional roadshows"
27th October2014,        "Branson accuses politicians of being 'cowardly' over Heathrow"
28th October 2014,       "British business urges backing for Heathrow expansion"
3rd November 2014,      "Potential Conservative party split emerges over Heathrow expansion"
3rd November 2014,      "Environment as important as economic impact of airport expansion, finds YouGov poll"
12th January 2015,       "Heathrow and Gatwick claim record performance in 2014"
19th January 2015,       "Gatwick unveils 'low-risk' two-runway plan"
29th January 2015,       "Abta calls for new runways at both Gatwick and Heathrow"

Flight Global.
21st September 2014,   "Gatwick eyes point-to-point routes for long-haul growth" 

Airwise/Reuters
21st January 2015,        "UK Needs Quick Decision On New London Runway"


This blogger thinks it unnecessary to comment on each article. Readers can absorb what is written and come to their own conclusions. Sufficient it is to say that each person, grouping, poltical party or administrative area is pushing its own agenda for its own reasons. They do not necessarily reflect this blogger´s.
The most significant point to note is that mentioned on 12th January about an increase in traffic at both Heathrow (to 73.4 million passengers - up 1.4%) and Gatwick (to 38 million passengers - up 7.6% ) in 2014 compared to 2013. The problem about the need for expansion of capacity will not go away.



Let us look at some truths....

1-There is a big demand for more runway capacity in the South East of England.
2-More runway movements mean more flights into one, two or more, or all the airports in the South East region. Denying that is ignoring the evident. There is a demand and it has to be satisfied one way or another.
3-There are arguments both in favor and against the expansion of one airport or another.
4-The preferences for increasing the capacity of one airport or another is, many times, the ability of the politicians to convince people to their way of thinking. 
5-More runway capacity means more flights, which mean more point-to-point or transfer passengers, which mean more economic benefit for the regions, the airports and the principal players at the airports. The more flights, the more likely the increase in connections to various destinations.
6-the country as a whole benefits, not just the South East region.
7-If no new runways are to be built at Heathrow or Gatwick then a new site has to be chosen. This means Luton or Stansted. Luton is the better situated airport but presents difficulties in construction - but nothing like an Estuary airport. Stansted would be the prefered solution for many in government or the Civil Service - as it has been since the early 1970s. However, with respect to the rest of the country it is out in the boondocks, difficult to reach and needing an excessive investment in infrastructure. Most of this infrastructure already exists at/to Luton.
8-Any such commitment to a "new site" implies a commitment to a new 4 runway airport - something which is not necessary with the expansion of both Heathrow and Gatwick.  
9-The choice of Luton as a new 4 runway airport could well mean the reduction, or even closure of Stansted. The choice of Stansted would well mean the closure of Southend and possibily Luton. Both choices mean a reduction in alternatives.

Let us look at some of the non-truths....

1- Limiting the number of flights at Heathrow or Gatwick airports does not mean a total reduction in flights in a region.
2-Can the demand for more flights be satisfied by replacing Heathrow flights with Stansted ones, or Gatwick flights with Luton ones? This is just wishful thinking.
3-Many people like to think that the unused capacity at regional airports can be used to satisfy demand.
In certain instances this might well be the case. However, it is not true in most cases. I do not hide behind the decision of British Airways(BA) to pull out of UK regional airports to justify the fact that there is no demand into and from the regions to warrant onward flows to long distance destinations. I honestly think that there could be a demand but BA is not interested. That then becomes a self serving argument - no in-put therefore, no out-put,  no in-connecting services therefore no outgoing services to North America or Asia --- even if the demand had been shown to exist  before.
4)- Any meaningful descision can be put off/delayed  to another Parliament.That is just sweeping the problem under the mat.
5)- Luton cannot be developed as a 4 runway airport. This is false since there is sufficient space between Luton and Harpenden to fit in 4 parallel independent runways which would not affect either town with overflying.The ground itself needs leveling but the work itself is far less than any envisaged on the construction of an Estuary airport.



From this point we can develop the argument to include many differing opinions.

This blogger has expounded on this issue before as stated so it is not necessary to repeat all the same arguments in detail.



Considering one aspect, extending Heathrow´s runways westwards towards the M25 can help in the issue of noise reduction.The northern runway can be extended 900 meters towards the M25 while the southern runway can be extended 1300 meters.
This means that noise pollution over West london can be mitigated to some extent since the aircraft can be landed that much further down each runway so eleviating the noise problem over extensive areas of West London.
Add to that the possibility of increasing the angle of descent for the landing aircraft then the height at which the aircraft fly into Heathrow (or Gatwick) can be increased to a fair tranch over the built up areas - the higher the approach the lower the noise. 

Extending the runways further west over the M25 motorway and even over the reservoirs west of the motorway is a possiblity but would be ridiculously expensive and unnecessary.

If measures can be taken to extend the runways westwards towards the M25 thus enabling aircraft to land further along each runway then the noise issue can be mitigated.
However, combine that with the improvement of aircraft and engine design (which has been evident over the past decades) then there can be a real reduction in noise pollution.
If then you go the one step further to legislate that ALL aircraft entering or leaving from Heathrow (or Gatwick for that matter) have maximum permitted noise levels, then you can ensure that the reduction in noise levels over West London (or Crawley in the case of Gatwick) is real and substantial.

The fuel pollution, i.e. CO2 or other toxic emissions, is limited by improvement in airline and engine technology. Over the years the emissions have been reduced to much lower levels so as to be more acceptable. A Boeing 787 does not have the same emission levels as a B767 or B757. An Airbus A380 or A350 does not have the same level of emissions as a B747-400 or an A340. These new aircraft provide a lower level of noise and pollution not seen before.
Quite frankly, it is really ridiculous to say that the effects of aircraft movements over any given area are the same in 2015 as in 1985 or will be in 2030. That is an ostrich approach.

This blogger believes that a third runway at Heathrow and a second runway at Gatwick can both be built to solve the shortage of runways in the South East of England. They both would mean years of investment but not from public money.

They should be permitted on the basis of a reduction in aircraft noise, measurable, verifiable and, if necessary, sanctionable for excesses. The same criteria would apply for toxic emissions. The fact that the aircraft landing and taking off from Heathrow and Gatwick had to conform to a limit of 55-57 decibels, or whatever were decided, together with engine emissions of xxxCO2, could make the constructuion of an extra runway at each airport viable.

Applying these reductions for all operations over two years gives time for the airlines to adapt (previously I said a generation but now I reduce the time limit because the roll out of the new aircraft will be faster than originally thought  -  so in effect since the initial idea was proposed until its implication a generation will almost have past). Maybe the British airlines should lead the way with European, American, Middle Eastern and Far Eastern airlines following. Then the "poor neighbours" could follow.

These rules applied to Heathrow and Gatwick would mean a big change in flying patterns. Applying them later to Luton and Stansted would help redistribute the traffic into/out of London.

Other considerations:
A third runway at Heathrow does mean a new terminal. This would be situated over the road and rail tunnel out from the terminals 2 and 3. It might even be called Terminal 1(previously I called it Terminal 6) to replace the previous terminal which is due to be taken down. Then it would have a direct connection to the Heathrow Express services and the Crossrail services (as they will then be) to the rest of the airport and into central London.

Having a terminal north of the Bath Road does not mean there would be any necessity for aircraft to cross over the northern runway to gain access to any terminal. The best solution would be for all flights out of the (new) terminal one to connect to the islands and near connections. By this I mean Ireland and all the islands of Great Britain, plus others such as The Faroes, Iceland, Malta and even the Benelux countries, without excluding others. I mean all flights so that no airline or alliance is affected negatively.
That way BA (oneworld), Brussels Airlines(Star Alliance) and KLM(Skyteam) would be equally affected.
This is what was suggested in the previous article in February 2012.





News which is both good and worrying:
These headlines link to articles about all of London´s main airports and the increase in passengers year on year at each. Such is the reflection of an improving economy.
"Stansted welcomes over two million more passengers in 2014"  (Air Transport News 12-1-15)
"Record passenger numbers for London Luton Airport in 2014" (Air Transport News 8-1-15)
"Record year at London City Airport a sign of confidence" (Air Transport News 8-1-15)
 "Heathrow traffic and business commentary December 2014" (Air Transport News 12-1-15)

London Gatwick Airport: Facts and Stats



All well and good, but the worrying part is the delay in deciding on runway expansion in the south-east. This information surely illustrates the need to take decisions now and not after the next election. We are a victim of our own success.

We do not want any fudging. Let the government lay down (strict) conditions for runway building, then let both Heathrow and Gatwick get on with the job of building the extra runways at both airports with their own funding.
Not one but two runways are going to be needed by mid century. Cannot we anticipate demand for once?


Gatwick´s second runway option.



The analysis provided by the airline site anna.aero on 21st January 2015, provides some interesting comparative information about both Heathrow and Gatwick.

Let me quote the complete concluding paragraph....
"....It’s pretty obvious to anyone that both airports are clearly running close to maximum capacity and both are highly vulnerable to disruption (such as sudden bad weather or an operational emergency). An additional runway at both airports would considerably help with reliability as well as creating opportunities for significant traffic growth, and benefits to the UK economy of somewhere around a whopping £300 billion ($500 billion). To get this figure we combined the Airport Commission’s estimates of the economic benefit of each runway – a total exceeding £340 billion – and ‘slightly’ discounted the total to account for overlaps – in truth nobody knows what the actual figures are, but it is safe to say the benefits would be an absurdly huge boost to the UK economy and competitiveness, were any political party able to explain it to the electorate."

This blogger supports this view wholeheartedly.

Now on 3rd february 2015 the last chance to provide evidence for consultation presents itself..
To join the debate and tell the Airports Commission your feelings visit:
www. smartsurvey.co.uk/s/134578HXHDU.

28 December 2012

HM e-petitions - some which are still open.

Her Majesty´s government, in a effort to act more transparently and within the ways of thinking of the voters, has been using the possibility of presenting petitions online to the government. The aim is to give voters the way to express their opinions over a wide variety of issues with the most supported gaining a voice in the House of Commons. This aspect of British democracy is not that widely known or used.

Since this blog is devoted to transport issues in the UK this blogger thought it might prove useful for readers to see some of the petitions which are still open and thus able to be adhered to for those who wish to. Obviously, this list, though extensive, is not comprehensive. I have used the petitions pending, only at the Dept. for Transport and not those which might be found at other offices or departments. The total number of petitions at the DfT is 675 while for the whole government it comes to 6315.



The most successful petition open at the moment is that dealing with the Virgin Trains fiasco, when it was going to be discharged from its duties as a rail franchisee to be replaced by the First Group. As readers will remember this has provoked a scandal at the Department for Transport, leading to the suspension of the proposed change and Virgin Trains remaining the franchisee for the next two years. It can still be signed up to mid February.
Reconsider West Coast Mainline franchise decision.

However, that petition is not the only one dealing with
rail franchises.
Reinstate Virgin Trains WCML

West Coast rail Franchise

Do not renew West Coast's Franchise 

Do not reconsider giving First Group WCML Franchise

Take West Coast line from Branson's Virgin 

Government to pay for West Coast failure

West coast rail line public money 

DO NOT PAY COMPENSATION TO WEST COAST RAILWAY BIDDERS


These do not mean that commentators are not concerned about other franchises
Users of train services to have bigger say over franchise renewals

Introduce public consultation into rail franchising 

Review First Capital Connect's franchise

Abandon rail franchising and hand all existing franchises to state-owned Directly Operated Railways as they expire.

Nationalise the Railways of Britain

Bring back British Railways

nationalise railways

Make public transport state owned across England and Wales

Keep The East Coast Mainline Rail Franchise In Public Ownership

Abandon East Coast Mainline franchise and run the line on an open access basis

Southestern Railway Metro Line Passenger Campaign

London Midland - Should Be Stripped of Contract 

London Midland should face disciplinary action

London Midland Franchise to be Removed 

Strip First Capital Connect of Thameslink Franchise Immediately

Stop Greater Anglia Franchise Renewal

Punish walking away from rail franchises with a ban on bidding for Government contracts

Train opperators who have mismanaged previous franchises should not be able to bid for current trainline franchises.


High Speed Rail link and other rail investment.

HS2 Alternative Route (Bow Group Route)

Introduce HS2 prior to 2033.

No to HSR2 Yes to Superfast Broadband 

Re-build Great Central Railway instead of building HS2

H2O not HS2

Stop HS2 in the Chilterns

If High speed rail (HS2) is built ensure UK trains are used

HS2

HS2 to stop at towns on the way to Birmingham

Rail Link £32b HS2 Good Idea but cost will end up £64b as always Govt project are late & cost will double.

17 Billion spent on HR2 would be better spent on Truck Roads and Cycle only lanes

Defence Cuts v. HS2

hs2 heathrow hub ltd

Citizenship Assessment Stop HS2 campaign

A demand fair Compention for Compulsory Orders for HS2


Though not all refer to HS2

MANCHESTER NORTH HUB  

Lower Rail Fares: Disband Network Rail and hand all infrastructure to the train companies

Investigate the benefits of Maglev technology

FULL HIGH SPEED RAIL FOR THE NORTH EAST

High Speed Rail to North East and Scotland


Time for the Government to take into account the infrastructure problems in South East Essex

More carriages for cross country train service 

Creation of a Eurostar Hub in Leicester

Bring the £9.5 Billion rail investment forward

Electrify the Weston super line as Bristol is just not far enough

Extend the electrification of the Trans Pennine route to Kingston upon Hull

why is the government subsidising rail companies?

Increase the frequency of rail journeys between major cities and surrounding towns. 

The UK Government to stop subsidising the rail link to Scotland if Scotland goes independent.



Most in this section refer to Heathrow and the possibility of an airport in the Thames estuary, though some would castigate certain politicians by building a new airport in their constituencies.
Airports/airlines:

Say NO to the Thames Estuary Airport!
 
Peak Oil and Airport Expansion

Charges for pick-up and drop-off parking at airports

All faces uncovered at airports, shops and city centres

Restrict the Number of Flights into Heathrow Airport

Stop Heathrow 'Freedom' Trials over Fulham, Putney and Barnes 

Expand Birmingham Airport instead of Heathrow

STOP A 3RD RUNWAY AT HEATHROW AND GOVERNMENT WASTING MORE TAX PAYERS MONEY ON THIS

Build The Severn Barrier and new London Island Airport now

Put in place a strong and long term decision regarding the expansion of London's airport capacity before 2015

Build a new commercial airport in Tim Yeo's constituency

Stop Heathrow Operational Freedoms Trial with immediate effect - all areas

Build a third runway at Heathrow.

A New International Airport between Bristol & Worcester

Estuary Airport at the Hoo

Build the 'Boris Island' airport rather than HS2

London and South East airport expansion.

boring "air traffic"

Thames Estuary Airport - Move west rather than east

The Civil Aviation Authority is not fit for purpose

Build A New International Airport in David Cameron's constituency

Is the Davies Airport Commission fit for purpose, considering it will take two and a half years to deliver their findings?

repealing liquid law on flights

Provide a smoking area at UK Airport

Airport Security Staff should not be employed by the individual airports owners.

Reciprocity in airline/infrastructre takeovers 

What can be done about aircraft noise? Petition for aircraft noise to be classed as a statutory nuisance.

package airline seating arrangements


This section deals with a real pot-pourri of subjects, though most refer to roads and road traffic.
Miscellaneous :

A1(M) upgrade.

Project Alexander: dual the A1 from Morpeth to Berwick

Stop the proposed destruction of the world's first passenger railway line in Manchester by Network Rail's Ordsall link aaand alternatives be found.

save manchester mayfield station

Reduce The Driving Age To 16

Fuel Cost in Rural Areas Needs Discounting

NO to London formula one proposal

Use this recession (spare construction capacity, lower costs) to build new motorway between London and Cornwall

Amended Action on the M62 Managed Motorway Plan

INDUSTRIOUS NORTH OF ENGLAND Fix the M62 and improve GDP

Remove seven bridge toll

Scrap the Severn bridge toll charge

The Future of Tolls on the Severn River Crossings 

CRUISES TO THE FALKLANDS

Improve transport links within Falklands. 

Implementation of a completely driverless system for the London Underground

forces travel

British Armed Forces Free Transport

Add a junction to the M4 between 2 and 3 (near Chiswick roundabout)

Use this recession (lower costs, spare construction capacity) period to build new motorway to fill obvious gaps and complete the existing network.

A5 Hockliffe Bypass

The State Of Rail Travel In Lincolnshire

Trains should have adequate seating for 2nd class passengers

Surrey Bus Services within M25

Save Mersey Ferries

re openkildwick and crosshills railway station

Bus Passes That Work Across The UK

Somerset & Dorset railway

Timetable fast South West Train services from Ascot to London Waterloo and vice versa.

Raise the speed limit on the M6 toll to 80mph

Ban private cars from UK roads 

Preventing disruption to train services due to weather

Increase Speedlimits on British Motorways to 100Mph

M64 - Stoke on Trent to Leciester. Congestion in stoke is ridiculous, as a result of cars clogging the streets, please help my city, please help me.

Create a motorway link from M54 to Welshpool

A40 between Oxford and Witney

Trains inspections and money devolution for delays and poor service in the national trains

A12 improvements London to Ipswich

Improving the Ipswich stretch of the A14

Dartford River Crossing - tolls on northbound carriageway only 

Improve Traffic Flow At Dartford Toll Crossing

Replace tolls at dartford crossing with congestion tax style technology

Scrap the Dartford crossing tolls

Stop the Toll increse of 50p in October 2012 & 2014 for the Dartford Crossing Kent & Essex

Rename Dartford Crossing the Dick Turpin Way

ban new toll roads

No tolls at Blackwall tunnel

New River Crossing between Essex/Kent

Petition for an extra train carriage on the Tarka Line (from Barnstaple to Exeter and vice versa)

Later running trains and tube

Search and Rescue Helicopter for N.Ireland

Do not nationalise Search and Rescue

Scrap Budget Airlines' hidden charges

Lack of transport in rural communities

Make public transport state owned across England and Wales

Re-Nationalisation of London Buses

End aviation subsidy

Campaign against short hop air travel 

Re-open the disused Wisbech &  March Railway line

Reinstate the Lewes - Uckfield Rail Link

Reconnect the Pickering to Malton Rail Link

Preservation & Reopening of the Llangollen to Ruabon Railway 

Introduce a half hourly Wrexham Bidston rail service

Stop Thameslink/Wimbledon loop terminating at Blackfriars

Protect Disused railway track beds from development

Save Preston Bus Station

Stop Preston City Council Demolition of Bus Station

Change the definition of an 'on time' train
 

As can be seen there are many petitions pertaining to the same subject. This is despite the website insisting you look for another petition on the same subject before you submit one.

For me it just goes to show how a government can deluge us with lots of information about a subject which we end up not reading in case we have an opinion about it. Thus its effectiveness as a democratic tool is reduced..

However, I still consider this to be a positive way of voicing opinions, and can be used much more in the future.

Please note that you can sign more than one petition if you are so inclined - even if the subject is the same.